Legal Opinion

C. E. Sharp Lumber Co. v. Kansas Ice Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 18, 1914No. 3765PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error from District Court, Woods County; R. H. Eoofbourrozv, Judge. Action by the American Tie & Lumber Company, Limited, a coq:>oration, against Kansas Ice Company, a corporation, the Blanchard Construction Company, a corporation, the Capitol Iron Works Company, a corporation, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, a corporation, and the C. E. Sharp Lumber Company, a corporation.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Woods County; R. H. Eoofbourrozv, Judge. Action by the American Tie & Lumber Company, Limited, a coq:>oration, against Kansas Ice Company, a corporation, the Blanchard Construction Company, a corporation, the Capitol Iron Works Company, a corporation, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, a corporation, and the C. E. Sharp Lumber Company, a corporation. Judgment on the pleadings against the C. E. Sharp Lumber Company as to its answer and cross-petition against the Kansas Ice Company, and from such judgment C. E. Sharp Lumber Company brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This action was instituted by the American Tie & Lumber Company against the Kansas Ice Company and others above named, to determine the priority of certain liens against the ice company’s plant. The C. E. Sharp Lumber Company filed its answer of general denial to the original petition and its cross-petition against the Kansas Ice Company, seeking to enfoi-ce and foreclose a materialman’s lien against such company for lumber and material to the amount of $374.95, furnished to the ice company for the construction of a building for an ice plant at Wewoka, Okla. The issues…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Emmerson v. BotkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Ardmore Nat. Bank v. Briggs MacHinery & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Hurst v. SawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Griffin v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. Estes Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Deming Inv. Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API