Ardmore Nat. Bank v. Briggs MacHinery & Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Ind. T. Error from the United States Gourt for the Southern District of the Indian Territory at Tishomingo; before J. T. Dickerson, Judge. Bill by the Briggs Machinery & Supply Company and others against the Tishomingo Oil & Cotton Company, in which suit the Continental Gin Company and the Ardmore National Bank and others intervened. Judgment for complainants and the intervenor the gin company, and against intervenor the Ardmore National Bank, and the bank brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
The appellees Briggs Machinery & Supply Company, Collins & Dulaney, and Stilwell-Bierce & Smith-Vaile Company, who hereafter will be called the complainants, commenced the proceedings out of which this suit grows by filing their bill in equity alleging that the Tishomingo Oil & Cotton Company, which will hereafter be called the Oil Company, was indebted to them severally as follows: To the Briggs Machinery & Supply Company, $7,864.64; to Collins & Dulaney, the sum of $4,580.88; to the Stil-well-Bierce & Smith-Vaile Company, in the sum of $5,546.65. All of these sums were evidenced by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kelly's Heirs v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
- Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Alexander v. RelfeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Leonhard v. FloodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Wasson v. ConnorMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. VoylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- C. E. Sharp Lumber Co. v. Kansas Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Patterson v. RousneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Davis v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.