Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Sawyer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1894PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error from the District Gourt of Canadian Gounty. Action of ejectment, broug'ht by Hamlin W. Sawyer against James D. Hurst, to recover the possession of a a tract of school land leased by plaintiff, and for damages.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bierer, J.:

Hamlin W. Sawyer, the appellee, filed his complaint in ejectment in the district court of Canadian county on the 25th day of February, 1893, against the defendant, to recover the possession of certain school land, described as the northwest quarter of section 36, township number 12, north of range 5 west, in Canadian county, and for damages against the defendant for the withholding of the possession of said land from the plaintiff by the defendant. The plaintiff alleged his estate in said land to be that of a tenant for a term of years,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Romine v. RomineIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. East v. PedenIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Lotz v. BriggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Shipley v. ShookIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Ewert v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. Stiles, Treasurer v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API