Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. Estes Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Bryan County; J. L. Bappolee, Judge. Action by the Bishop-Babcock-Becker Company against the Estes Drug Company and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action upon certain promissory notes and to foreclose a chattel mortgage executed to secure their payment. The petition is in the usual form, and admittedly states a cause of action. The answer, in effect, alleged that the notes were executed in payment of certain articles of personal property, to wit, a earbonator for a soda-water fountain and the accessories belonging thereto, which were sold to the defendant by the plaintiff for a particular purpose, to wit, the maintenance of a cold-drink department in connection with his drug business ; that from the beginning the earbonator…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Dean v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Turben v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Schreiner v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Ash v. Chas F. Noble Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. MerchantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.