Legal Opinion

Scheible v. Hogan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1925No. 18787 and 18853PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

The 'Court of Appeals of Mahoning county heard this case upon evidence and made a general finding in favor of the plaintiffs. It does not appear by the journal entry on file whether this conclusion was reached upon evidence establishing the fáct of interference with property rights, or whether it may have been reached upon evidence establishing the fact of unlawful discrimination, or whether, upon the other hand, that court merely decided as a legal proposition that, where there is a conflict between a city ordinance and an order of the Utilities Commission, the order of the Utilities…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lorain Street Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Ekern v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Effenberger v. MarconnitNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Alspaugh v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API