Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1927No. 20109, 20110, 20111, 20112, 20113, 20114, 20115, 20116, and 20028PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
No. 20109 is a proceeding in error, prosecuted by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company against the Public Utilities Commission, to reverse the final order of that commission authorizing the Forrest Motorbus Transportation Company to sell, and the Buckeye Service Company to buy, certificates of public convenience and necessity Nos. 136 and 1119, authorizing the operation of motor transportation lines for the transportation of passengers between Cleveland and Medina, and between Cleveland and Wooster, Ohio.
No. 20110 is a proceeding in error prosecuted by the same plaintiff in error from a like…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Westhoven v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Scheible v. HoganOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Estabrook v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by30 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Red Arrow Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Hutton v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- McKay v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.