Lorain Street Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The chief controversy in this case turns upon the construction to be given Section 614-86, General Code (110 Ohio Laws, 214). An analysis thereof shows that the Commission is clothed with power and authority to do the following things: (1) Supervise and regulate motor transportation companies; (2) fix, alter, and regulate rates; (3) regulate service and safety of operation; (4) prescribe safety regulations and designate stops for service and safety on established routes; (5) require the filing of reports; (6) provide uniform accounting systems; (7) supervise and regulate motor transportation…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Coventry Township v. EckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Ramey v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.