Legal Opinion

Lorain Street Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1925No. 18591 to 18597PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The chief controversy in this case turns upon the construction to be given Section 614-86, General Code (110 Ohio Laws, 214). An analysis thereof shows that the Commission is clothed with power and authority to do the following things: (1) Supervise and regulate motor transportation companies; (2) fix, alter, and regulate rates; (3) regulate service and safety of operation; (4) prescribe safety regulations and designate stops for service and safety on established routes; (5) require the filing of reports; (6) provide uniform accounting systems; (7) supervise and regulate motor transportation…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coventry Township v. EckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Ramey v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API