Legal Opinion
Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1937No. 25886PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The first contention made by the appellant is that the trial court should have directed a verdict in its behalf upon the authority of Skinner v. Penna. Rd. Co., 127 Ohio St., 69, 186 N. E., 722; Gumley, Admr., v. Cowman, 129 Ohio St., 36, 193 N. E., 627; and Watt v. Jefferson Trucking Co., 130 Ohio St., 99, 196 N. E., 887.
Appellant contends that this court should hold as a matter of law that the plaintiff was driving his truck at a greater speed than would “permit him to bring it to a stop within the assured clear distance ahead,” in violation of Section 12603, General Code, and was thereby…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. FadelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Pressman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.