Legal Opinion

Effenberger v. Marconnit

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1939No. 30433PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the railway commission of this state finding that the respondent, Fred P. Marconnit, had no right to operate a bus line under a certificate of convenience and necessity issued on May 12, 1936, and further finding that complainants Hedwig Effenberger, Bernard Effenberger and Marie Schoenberg were the holders of such certificate and ordering that the respondent cease and desist from operating the bus line.

The record discloses that on January 4, 1936, the Safety Motor Lines made application to the railway commission for a certificate of convenience and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Board of Excise v. . BarrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Pleuler v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Martin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Publix Cars, Inc. v. Yellow Cab & Baggage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hutton v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Hergott v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Moritz v. Transcontinental Bus Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Beisner v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Neylon v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API