State ex rel. Ekern v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
An opinion and mandate affirming the ruling below has been entered in this case. The important and far-reaching effect of a decision on such a- constitutional amendment and doubts arising at and since the time of consultation led to its further consideration, and the court has now reached a conclusion requiring a contrary disposition of the case, and therefore we now .withdraw the first mandate and opinion and make the present change before the case leaves our control; feeling that the court, as heretofore expressed (State ex rel. Postel v. Marcus, 160 Wis. 354, 381, 152 N. W. 419), is ready…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Matter of McAneny v. . Bd. of Estimate, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- State ex rel. Mueller v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Browne v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Van Gilder v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Zilisch v. AuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Michalek v. LeGrandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.