Legal Opinion
IELLO v. Weiner
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 7, 2011No. AC 32345PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Marcia Iello, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant Michael Weiner. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that her action was time barred by the applicable statute of limitations 2 and could not be saved under General Statutes § 52-593. 3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following relevant facts and procedural history. On September 4, 2003, the plaintiff commenced a dental malpractice action against Kenneth Epstein, her former dentist, and Family…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Billerback v. CerminaraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Krevis v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finkle v. CarrollConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Finkle v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- Finkle v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015