Legal Opinion
Billerback v. Cerminara
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 17, 2002No. AC 21618PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The plaintiff, Josephine Billerback, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Gregory Cermi-nara and Palma Cerminara. The issue presented is whether the court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment when it determined that the plaintiff could not bring her action under General Statutes § 52-5931 after her first action had been dismissed for dormancy. The court concluded that the plaintiff could not bring a new action under § 52-593 because a judgment of dismissal for dormancy is not within the category…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Andrew Ansaldi Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Vessichio v. HollenbeckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Parrott v. MeachamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Perzanowski v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Isidro v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Davis v. Family Dollar StoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Walker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Finkle v. CarrollConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.