Legal Opinion
Finkle v. Carroll
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 20, 2012No. AC 32725PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiff, Jennie Finkle, admin-istratrix of the estate of Barbara A. Eckert (decedent), appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, the town of Water-town (town) and John F. Carroll III, a police officer employed by the town. On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the court improperly concluded that her action, which was time barred by the applicable statute of limitations, could not be saved by General Statutes § 52-593. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following relevant undisputed facts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Florian v. LengeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Billerback v. CerminaraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Isidro v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2663 v. Department of Children & FamiliesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Finkle v. CARROLL IIISupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Finkle v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- Finkle v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- Hall v. GulaidConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016