Legal Opinion

Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 11, 2005No. SC 17256PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

The plaintiff, Kristine Cogan, appeals, following our grant of certification, 1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corporation. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that her action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations and could not be saved under General Statutes § 52-593, 2 which permits a new action to be filed beyond the applicable statute of limitations period when a plaintiff has failed to obtain judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. State v. LuttersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Stickney v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Wolf v. SulikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Smart v. BissonetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API