Legal Opinion

State v. Tew

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1983No. 822SC782PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Though the evidence of record certainly points the finger of suspicion at the defendants, it is not sufficient, in our opinion, to justify their conviction of the offense charged, and the case against them must be dismissed. This is because the record, even when favorably viewed for the State, as our law requires on motions to dismiss, State v. Cummings, 301 N.C. 374, 271 S.E. 2d 277 (1980), does not contain substantial evidence of every essential element of the crime charged. State v. Stephens, 244 N.C. 380, 93 S.E. 2d 431 (1956).

The essential elements of the crime that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. BlizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Yassoo Enterprises, Inc. v. North Carolina Joint Underwriting Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API