State v. Blizzard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
The defendant’s exception to the consolidation of the three cases for trial presents a rather serious question. However, at the time the consolidation was ordered, the court accepted the State’s theory that the defendant may have committed the several offenses in order to terrorize the family of his girl friend, Dorothy Jones. However, at the close of the evidence the court dismissed the malicious injury warrant and reduced the assault charge from a felony to a misdemeanor. We are inclined to hold, therefore, that the court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the State…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. ArsadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. SilvaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.