Legal Opinion

State v. Joyner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1979No. 72PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendant’s assignments of error challenge the following actions of the trial court: (1) denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss, because of insufficiency of the evidence, the charges of first degree rape, armed robbery, crime against nature, and assault inflicting serious injury; (2) instructing the jury on the principle of “acting in concert”'; (3) stating the contentions of defendant; and (4) curtailing defendant’s cross-examination of one of the state’s witnesses. We find no merit in any of defendant’s assignments of error and conclude that he has had a fair trial free from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Delaware Republican State Committee v. RedfearnSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. PoolosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API