Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1988No. 8725SC1069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant Clark’s Appeal

In his first argument and by assignments of error 75-79, defendant contends that the trial court erred by questioning defendants’ witness Edwards in a manner which suggested the court’s opinion as to the witness’ credibility. We disagree.

While receiving testimony on Edwards’ training and experience in the area of fire investigation, the following exchange occurred:

Court: Let me stop you there. I thought that I heard you say the Merchant Marines that you were in.

A: Yes, the United States Navy Merchant Marine operated ....

COURT: Is that not located in New…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re RhyneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API