Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 2016No. 15-1289PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*239 Where the language of the indictment was sufficient to charge defendant with burning certain buildings, the trial court properly exercised jurisdiction over the matter. Where defendant cannot establish plain error, his challenge that the trial court abandoned its gatekeeping function must fail. Likewise, where defendant cannot establish prejudice, his ineffective assistance of counsel claim must also fail. However, where the amount of restitution awarded was not supported by the evidence, we remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

On 6 January 2014, a Durham County…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API