Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1980No. 54PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Failure of the court to nonsuit constitutes each defendant’s first assignment of error.

A motion to nonsuit requires the trial court to consider the evidence in its light most favorable to the State, take it as true and give the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. State v. Goines, 273 N.C. 509, 160 S.E. 2d 469 (1968). Whether the evidence is direct, circumstantial, or both, if there is evidence from which a jury could find that the offense charged has been committed and that defendant committed it, the motion to nonsuit should be overruled.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. WrennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API