Legal Opinion

Mills v. Browning

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1933No. 12662PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This suit was filed by Leo Mills, appellant, against Perry Browning, sheriff of Wichita county, appellee, on the 16th day of May, 1931, to recover 10 automatic mint-vending machines which the plaintiff had seized and had condemned under articles 636 and 637, Rev. Criminal Statutes (Penal Code).

Appellee, Browning, answered by a general denial and a special plea, to the effect that each of the machines for which the plaintiff sued constituted a gambling device, and the same were being used for gambling purposes.

The evidence was submitted to a jury on special issues, in answer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Queen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Chambers v. BachtelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  3. Vaiden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Broaddus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. State v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. State v. One Slot MachineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. O. D. Jennings & Co. v. MaestriCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API