Legal Opinion

Vaiden v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 1932No. 8859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, J.. This appeal is from an order overruling a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction restraining appellants, E. E. Vaiden and Bouis Crixell, from operating a “pool hall” in the city of Harlingen, in alleged violation of article 4668, R. S. 1925. The injunction was granted at the instance of the county attorney, acting in behalf of the state.

The injunction was granted, and dissolution thereof refused, upon the ground that appellants were operating a pool hall as defined and prohibited by article 466S, the pertinent provisions of which are as follows: “Art. 4668. Pool halls. — No…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Countee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Watson v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. McCombs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mills v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Taylor v. McQuaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Suzuki v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API