State v. Langford
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEITH, Chief Justice.
This action was brought by the State of Texas, through the District Attorney of Gregg County, against Dewitt Langford, who was alleged to have been the owner and operator of four described marble machines, and Red Purtle, Maxine Parker, Jeff Burgess and Ruel F. Brown, in whose places of business' said machines were alleged to have been exhibited under .his direction, for the purpose of having appellees appear and show cause why said machines should not be destroyed as gambling devices under Art. 637 of Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code. Appellees answered by general…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rankin v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Roberts v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Chambers v. BachtelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Houghton v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Hoffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Broaddus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Commonwealth v. RiversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.