Legal Opinion

State v. One Slot Machine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 18, 1957No. 13253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

This is an action in rem brought in the name of the State of Texas against one marble table to obtain an order for the destruction of the machine on the ground that it is a slot machine and a gambling device under the provisions of Article 642a, Penal Code of Texas. The owner of the machine was duly cited and appeared, and was represented by counsel in the trial of the case. The machine at the time of its seizure was located in the Original Mexican and Italian Foods Cafe in the City of Corpus Christi, Texas. The trial court upon a hearing without a jury denied the State’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Hightower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. State v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. State v. Pinball MacHinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1977
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1980
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API