Legal Opinion
Queen v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided December 20, 1922No. 7113PublishedCited by 16 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Milam County of a violation of the lottery law, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100.
There are two counts in the information. Responsive to appellant’s motion to quash, the first count was held bad, and the case was tried under the second count which is as follows:
“On or about the 8th.day of April, 1922, in Milam County, Texas, one John Queen did then and there establish a lottery, the same being then and there a scheme and device for the distribution of chewing gum and trade checks by chance among those patronizing said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arnold v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Randle v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- State v. RandleTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- People ex rel. Verchereau v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Harris v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Boatwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.