Legal Opinion

O. D. Jennings & Co. v. Maestri

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1938No. 8795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was against the Mayor and the Superintendent of Police of the City of New Orleans for an injunction. The complaint was that thirty-five automatic candy venders, which plaintiff had manufactured and consigned to itself in New Orleans, had been seized and confiscated by the defendants as gambling devices under the purported authority of Act No. 231 of 1928;1 that they were threatening to continue to seize any candy venders found operating or stored in New Orleans, thus preventing plaintiff from carrying on its business, and thereby depriving it of its property…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Harvie v. Heise, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. Manchester v. MarvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Mills Novelty Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Quatrevingt v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. BoothLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. State v. RicksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  5. Adams v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCESSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API