Legal Opinion
Cargill, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 18, 2004No. 00-00189PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated (“Car-gill”) moves pursuant to USCIT R. 56 for summary judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material facts. Defendant cross-moves for summary judgment seeking an order dismissing the case.
JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2000).
STANDARD OF REVIEW
On a motion for summary judgment, the Court must determine whether there are any genuine issues of fact that are material to the resolution of the action. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.