Legal Opinion
BASF Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 28, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-28; Court 02-00260PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge:
This opinion and judgment follow a bench trial. The issue before the Court is the tariff classification of Plaintiffs, BASF Corporation (“BASF” or “Plaintiff’), trademarked polyisobutylene amine (“PIBA”) in a solution of hydrocarbon solvent. The trade name of Plaintiffs PIBA in solvent is PURADD® FD-100. In the United States, PURADD® FD-100 is used in the production of gasoline detergent additive packages. At importation, the United States Customs Service 1 (“Customs” or “Defendant”) classified PU-RADD® FD-100 in tariff subheading 3811.19.00 of the Harmonized Tariff…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Irwin Industrial Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.