Legal Opinion

United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 28, 2008No. Slip op. 08-60; Court 04-00650PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Post-Trial Opinion

CARMAN, Judge.

The Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) initiated this action 1 against Defendant, UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc. (“UPS”) seeking to enforce monetary penalties of $75,000 for UPS’s alleged violation of section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1641 (2000) (“the broker statute”). 2

In order to prevail, Customs needs to satisfy the statutory requirements of section 1641(b)(4), 3 which require that it prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, (1) that UPS was a licensed “customs broker”; (2) that UPS was engaged in “customs…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010
  3. United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API