United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Post-Trial Opinion
CARMAN, Judge.
The Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) initiated this action 1 against Defendant, UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc. (“UPS”) seeking to enforce monetary penalties of $75,000 for UPS’s alleged violation of section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1641 (2000) (“the broker statute”). 2
In order to prevail, Customs needs to satisfy the statutory requirements of section 1641(b)(4), 3 which require that it prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, (1) that UPS was a licensed “customs broker”; (2) that UPS was engaged in “customs…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010