Legal Opinion

Warner-Lambert Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 3, 2008No. Consol. 06-00104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff Warner-Lambert Company (“Plaintiff’ or “WLC”) challenges the classification of Certs® Cool Mint Drops by the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 1 (“Defendant” or “Customs”) under Heading 1704 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) covering sugar confectionery. 2 Plaintiff maintains that the merchandise at issue is properly classified under Heading 3306, HTSUS, as “preparation for oral or dental hygiene.” This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT R. 56.

JURISDICTION

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Container Store v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  2. Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API