Legal Opinion

Shore v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1989No. 470PA88PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

We hold that the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for Lumbermens ,Mutual Casualty Company.

This appeal arises from an automobile collision in which Nora Shore and Joan Hinson were injured when their car was struck by the car operated by Coleen Brown and owned by Doyle Brown. On 13 October 1986 at 11:17 a.m., the case of Doyle Brown and Coleen B. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company and General Motors Corporation (hereinafter Brown v. Lumbermens) was filed, the Browns alleging that Lumbermens breached its con tractual duty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Pittman v. PittmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. WS BOYD SALES COMPANY v. SeymourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. FRANK H. CONNER COMPANY v. Quenby Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Becker v. Graber Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Glenn-Robinson v. AckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Cobb v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Hejl v. Hood, Hargett & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API