Hayes v. City of Wilmington
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Decision here turns on whether the amended cross complaint filed by the defendants Cooper and Neal states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for contribution against the power company. In determining this question, these principles of law established by our decisions come into focus:
1. Liability for contribution under the provisions of G.S. 1-240 may not be invoked except among joint tortfeasors. Therefore, in order for one defendant to j oin another as a third-party defendant for the purpose of contribution, he must allege facts sufficient to show joint tort-feasorship and his…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Shore v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Kaleel Builders, Inc. v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.