State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of Lenoir
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
RodmáN, J.
We think it unnecessary to compare the facts stated in the judgment with the facts stipulated to ascertain if indeed there is a variance or a mere condensation of the agreed statement of facts; nor is it necessary to pass on exceptions 2, 3, and 4 to the court’s conclusions of law.
In our opinion the case can properly be disposed of by considering the exception to the judgment. If the correct result has been reached, the judgment should not be disturbed even though the court may not have assigned the correct reasons for the judgment entered.
A reading of the complaint immediately…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Vilas v. City of ManilaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Turner v. . ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- City of Winona v. School-District, No. 82Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Shore v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Duke Power Co. v. Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Opsahl v. Pinehurst Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.