Legal Opinion

FRANK H. CONNER COMPANY v. Quenby Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1967No. 536PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The Court was correct in its ruling. In Sales Co. v. Seymour, 255 N.C. 714, 122 S.E. 2d 605, this Court said:

“Decisions of this Court uniformly hold that the pendency of a prior action between the same parties for the same cause of action in a State court of competent jurisdiction works an abatement of a subsequent action either in the same court or in another court of the State having jurisdiction.”

We have this day decided the case of Quenby v. Conner, ante, p. 208. The facts alleged in that case are substantially similar to the ones involved herein. In dismissing this action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. WS BOYD SALES COMPANY v. SeymourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shore v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Ward v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Layell v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API