Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Pittman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1958No. 96PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

“The pendency of a prior action between the same parties for the same cause in a State court of competent jurisdiction works an abatement of a subsequent action either in the same court or in another court of the State having like jurisdiction.” McDowell v. Blythe Bros., 236 N.C. 396, 72 S.E. 2d 860. “The ordinary test for determining whether or not the parties and causes are the same for the purpose of abatement by reason of the pendency of the prior action is this: Do the two actions present a substantial identity as to parties, subject matter, issues involved, and relief demanded?” Cameron…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. In Re Sams'estateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. In Re the Estate of JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shore v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Wirth v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Atkins v. NashCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Perry v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Diamond Brand Canvas Products Co. v. ChristySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API