Legal Opinion
In Re Davy
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 21, 2011No. 10-BG-1162PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This reciprocal disciplinary proceeding is predicated upon an order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, dated September 8, 2003, accepting the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension of the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission and the respondent, Michelle Hamilton Davy. 1 See Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Hamilton, 377 Md. 54, 832 A.2d 170 (2003). Here, Bar Counsel seeks to impose “functionally-identical” reciprocal discipline pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(c), requesting that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for one year with her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re UchenduDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re FowlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re Ayres-FountainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re AngelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- In re PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re Sandy ChangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Haley v. Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual PropertyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- IN RE KRISTAN L. PETERSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016