Legal Opinion

In Re Angel

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2005No. 03-BG-1090, 04-BG-1486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

These consolidated cases involve recommendations for reciprocal discipline of public censure and a five-year suspension with a fitness requirement. On January 19, 1993, the Oklahoma Supreme Court publicly reprimanded the respondent, Steven M. Angel; a reciprocal case was opened in this jurisdiction when Bar Counsel learned of the discipline in Oklahoma (03-BG-1090). Thereafter, faced with thirteen additional grievances under investigation in Oklahoma, and claiming mental distress caused by family illnesses, respondent tendered his resignation from the practice of law in Oklahoma. On January…

2Cases cited5 opinions

In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
In Re LaibstainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
In Re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

In Re DavyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
In Re GoldmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
In Re LebowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
In Re TannerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006