Legal Opinion
In Re Ayres-Fountain
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 2008No. 06-BG-273PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
In this reciprocal discipline matter, respondent is challenging the identical reciprocal discipline recommendation made by the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board has proposed that we adopt its recommendation calling for a three-year suspension, to run nunc pro tunc from the date on which respondent filed her D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g) affidavit with this court, and a requirement that respondent prove her fitness to practice law before being reinstated. Respondent contends that requiring her to show fitness before being readmitted would be a grave injustice. Respondent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re SlaughterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re ArnettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re DavyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re HermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- IN RE: PAUL AARON HERMANDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In Re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re GadyeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.