Legal Opinion

Pacific Land Exchange v. Hunts

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 23, 1999No. AC 17406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The plaintiff, Pacific Land Exchange, appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for a deficiency judgment against the defendant Stanley M. Hunts1 after the trial court rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure in its favor. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly denied its motion for a deficiency judgment because it improperly excluded evidence of the listing of the subject property for sale and excluded the testimony of the plaintiffs expert witness as to the effect the excluded evidence would have on his opinion regarding the fair market value of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. UlenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. O'Shea v. MignoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. FrankelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Merchant v. State Ethics CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Musorofiti v. VlcekConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Puchalsky v. RappahahnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API