Legal Opinion

State v. Prioleau

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 22, 1995No. 14896PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The defendant, Herbert Prioleau, was convicted by a jury of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a,1 for fatally shooting the victim, *276Anthony Vitale. On appeal,2 the defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) instructed the jury on his claim of self-defense; (2) permitted the state to cross-examine him and offer rebuttal evidence regarding certain weapons and other related items found in his bedroom on the night of the shooting; (3) permitted the state to engage in inappropriate closing argument; and (4) instructed the jury on the element of intent. We affirm the…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. State v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API