Legal Opinion
O'Shea v. Mignone
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 29, 1998No. AC 17348PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant Jeffrey M. Mignone1 appeals from the judgment, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Bernard O’Shea, on his claims related to a negligence action. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) bifurcated the trial as to liability and damages, (2) excluded testimony by Barbara Farrington and Tracey Mignone and (3) excluded the testimony regarding an unidentified witness. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On January 17, 1997, the jury returned a verdict as to liability only, finding that the defendant, Jeffrey M. Mignone, was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gladstone, Schwartz, Baroff & Blum v. HovhannissianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Deana E.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Estela v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Pacific Land Exchange v. HuntsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Alabama v. WoodardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.