Legal Opinion
Puchalsky v. Rappahahn
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 24, 2001No. AC 20538PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff, Lawrence Puchalsky, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) admitted certain evidence concerning hospital records, (2) charged the jury on the doctrine of sudden emergency *74and (3) failed to set aside the verdict.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On April 14, 1997, at approximately 5:55 a.m., the plaintiff was walking on a picket line at the premises of the defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- D'AMATO v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. WeidenhofSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BermudezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Pickel v. Automated Waste Disposal, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Breen v. Synthes-Stratec, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- O'Donnell v. FenequeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Durso v. AquilinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.