Legal Opinion
Musorofiti v. Vlcek
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 28, 2001No. AC 19677PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The plaintiff Rocco Musorofiti (plaintiff husband) appeals from the judgment rendered following the denial of his motion for an additur or to set aside as to damages only a jury verdict in his favor against the defendants, Judith A. Vlcek and Ralph Vlcek, on his negligence claim. The plaintiff Barbara Musorofiti (plaintiff wife) appeals from the judgment in favor of the defendants as to her loss of consortium claim. On appeal, the plaintiff wife claims that the trial court improperly refused to charge the jury on the loss of consortium claim. Both plaintiffs claim that the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Country Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bellville v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Voris v. MolinaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Harlan v. Norwalk Anesthesiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Cousins v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Sanderson v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.