Legal Opinion

Waldecker v. Waldecker

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1918No. L. A. No. 4493. Department OnePublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying the plaintiff a divorce. The complaint in the action was in three counts, setting up, respectively, willful neglect, extreme cruelty, and desertion on the part of the defendant as grounds for a divorce. The defendant was served with process by publication and defaulted. After entry of such default the plaintiff proffered her proofs to the court, which, after hearing them, denied the divorce. In so doing the court simply made and entered its decree to that effect, but filed no findings of fact. The plaintiff appeals, urging two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Waller v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Perkins v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Keener v. KeenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Spaziani v. MillarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Del Ruth v. Del RuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API