Foley v. Foley
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from orders striking out a demurrer and entering default, and denying a motion to set aside a default, and denying motions for a new trial. J. C. B. Hsbbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Action for divorce, in which the corporation is joined as a party defendant to protect plaintiff’s rights in certain property alleged to have been conveyed to said corporation by the defendant, Daniel H. Foley, in fraud of and to defeat plaintiff’s rights therein.
The corporation made default, but subsequently moved that the default be vacated and it be allowed to answer, which motion was denied.
The defendant Foley interposed a demurrer to the complaint; but the court, on motion of plaintiff, struck out his demurrer and gave judgment against him as by default for his failure to pay certain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Golden Gate Consolidated Hydraulic Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Galland v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Board of Revenue v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.