Legal Opinion

Del Ruth v. Del Ruth

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1946No. Civ. 15268PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment which denied her separate maintenance and awarded defendant a divorce upon his cross-complaint. Plaintiff brought her action for separate maintenance, charging defendant with extreme cruelty. Defendant answered and filed a cross-complaint for divorce, charging plaintiff with extreme cruelty. The allegations of both parties were in general terms without specification of particular acts. The parties intermarried March 14, 1921, and have one child, a son, of the age of 21, years. They separated in July, 1944. Plaintiff is employed as a motion picture director…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Waldecker v. WaldeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Franklin v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bilger v. BilgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Weil v. WeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Goldberg v. Paramount Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API