Braddy v. . Pfaff
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The correctness of the judgment is assailed on two principal grounds: (1) That the evidence of payment by defendant Herbert E. Pfaff of his indebtedness to the estate was incompetent; and (2) there were errors in the court’s instructions to the jury.
1. By the provisions of the will of O. Y. Pfaff, the original source of title, the payment of “what amount he may be owing me, to my estate,” was made a condition precedent to the vesting of title to the described land in the defendant Herbert E. Pfaff. To show that this condition had been complied with, the plaintiff offered in evidence the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- In Re HegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . SterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . BrowningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Heilig v. . FoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Whiteman v. Seashore Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Motor Co. v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Batchelor v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.