Legal Opinion

State v. Bryant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1953No. 507PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendant assigns as error the instruction of the court as follows:

“Now, Gentlemen of the Jury, the Court has given you certain of the contentions of both the State and the defendant — not all of them. It is your duty to consider all of the contentions, both for the State and the defendant, and consider all of the eviídence or the LACK of evidence of both the State and of the defendant.”

The last sentence of the quoted instruction, as it appears in the record before us, was ineptly phrased and ill-advised. It is expressly disapproved. Even so, on this record we are not convinced that it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. . KigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . WeddingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. State v. Costner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API