Legal Opinion

In Re Hege

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

The record discloses that: “Copies of said report were mailed to all interested parties by the clerk. After which R. C. Rights, Dora Rights, Louis Rights and Mary Lineback, filed protest against the clerk allowing commissions. A date was set for hearing on said protest and at said hearing no one appearing to substantiate said protest; the respondent moved to dismiss same and approve the report. Motion denied and respondent excepted.”

It appears from the record that there were several controverted questions arising on the final report. Copies of the report were mailed to all interested parties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Thigpen v. Farmers Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. West v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . McCanlessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Battery Park Bank v. Western Carolina BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. SternWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Mauney v. MauneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. United Artists Records, Inc. v. Eastern Tape Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Manufacturing Co. v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Lamm v. . LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API