Batchelor v. Black
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
The propriety of the submission of the evidence to the jury on both issues, that of negligence of the defendants and that of contributory negligence of the plaintiff is so obvious on inspection of the foregoing evidence that we refrain from extended discussion. Hobbs v. Queen City Coach Co., 225 N.C. 323, 34 S.E. 2d 750; Crone v. Fisher, 223 N.C. 635, 127 S.E. 2d 642.
The exceptive assignments of error to the judge’s charge present two items which we discuss because of the importance attached to them in the argument:(a) The failure of the court to read as requested that section of the law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hobbs v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. StevensonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re Will of HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Crone v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Braddy v. . PfaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Therrell v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Kennedy v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Pittman Ex Rel. Pittman v. SwansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Radford v. MorrisHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Mavrolas v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960